Review policy

Review Policy (issues I–XXI)
The journal conducts an editorial review of all submitted papers. Editorial review means that the decision to accept, revise, or reject a paper is made by the journal’s editorial board, based on the expert assessment of the editor and, if necessary, in consultation with members of the editorial committee.

The process begins with an initial editorial check to determine whether the manuscript aligns with the journal’s thematic scope, the technical guidelines for authors, and the basic scientific and professional criteria. Manuscripts that do not meet these requirements will not proceed to further review.

As part of the editorial review, the following are evaluated:

• the scientific and/or professional soundness of the paper,

• the originality and relevance of the topic,

• the clarity of the argumentation and methodological consistency,

• the contribution to the development of scientific and professional discourse within the journal’s field.

In cases of uncertainty or the need for additional expert verification, the editorial board may request an external opinion from specialists in the relevant field.

The final decision on acceptance is made by the editor-in-chief, in consultation with the members of the editorial board. Authors receive an explanation of the decision and, if necessary, instructions for revision.

The aim of the editorial review process is to ensure the quality, relevance, and editorial consistency of the published contributions, through an efficient and transparent decision-making procedure.